Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Capture Activities directly to Salesforce without compromises with the most robust integration. ✅ Sync Emails, Calendars, Leads on your own terms. ✅ 100% customizable ✅ Custom object supported ✅ Flexible deployment options ✅ 14 day Free trial
| Outlook Integration for | Lightning Community Approval Requests | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
A one stop list view of all its users pending approval requests. Approval requests for all Salesforce Objects are displayed using the Lightning UI and can be approved or declined through the component.
| Metric | Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid | Lightning Community Approval Requests |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 1.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 512 | 10 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | freemium | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2015 | Sep 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Lightning Community Approval Requests's 1.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid at freemium, Lightning Community Approval Requests at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the larger user base (512 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lightning Community Approval Requests's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lightning Community Approval Requests's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid audit • Lightning Community Approval Requests audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Outlook Integration for | Lightning Community Approval Requests |
|---|---|---|
| calendar sync | #1 | Not ranked |
| email tracking | #1 | Not ranked |
| calendar | #1 | Not ranked |
| user requests matching | Not ranked | #9 |
| conversational user requests | Not ranked | #11 |
Both Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid and Lightning Community Approval Requests offer paid plans only. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid starts at freemium; Lightning Community Approval Requests starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 512 reviews) compared to Lightning Community Approval Requests (1.4★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 1.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the deeper published review base (512 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (512 reviews). Lightning Community Approval Requests typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid and Lightning Community Approval Requests both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lightning Community Approval Requests" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.