Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Capture Activities directly to Salesforce without compromises with the most robust integration. ✅ Sync Emails, Calendars, Leads on your own terms. ✅ 100% customizable ✅ Custom object supported ✅ Flexible deployment options ✅ 14 day Free trial
| Outlook Integration for | Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Please Note: **Use this limited solution for free; for increased usage and features Automate invoicing, order processing, and customer data synchronization between Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP, including Business Central,Dynamics GP and more.
| Metric | Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid | Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 512 | 8 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | freemium | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2015 | Dec 2010 |
Based on the data on this page, Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid at freemium, Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the larger user base (512 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid audit • Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Outlook Integration for | Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync |
|---|---|---|
| calendar sync | #1 | Not ranked |
| email tracking | #1 | Not ranked |
| calendar | #1 | Not ranked |
| microsoft 365 | Not ranked | #1 |
Both Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid and Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync offer paid plans only. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid starts at freemium; Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 512 reviews) compared to Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync (4.3★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the deeper published review base (512 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (512 reviews). Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid and Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Microsoft Dynamics NAV & GP (Great Plains) Integration for Salesforce by DBSync" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.