Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The Flickr Feeds component allows you to display public photos from your flickr account in your lightning pages.
| Flickr Feeds | B2B LE Video Player | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — |
This component lets you associate YouTube and/or externally hosted videos to your products. Display your videos in an accordion or tabular format.
| Metric | Flickr Feeds | B2B LE Video Player |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 3 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 2 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2015 | Jan 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, B2B LE Video Player is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 3.7★ vs Flickr Feeds's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Flickr Feeds at free, B2B LE Video Player at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to B2B LE Video Player; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Flickr Feeds's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than B2B LE Video Player's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Flickr Feeds audit • B2B LE Video Player audit
| Keyword | Flickr Feeds | B2B LE Video Player |
|---|---|---|
| feeds | #5 | #111 |
| feed | #91 | #12 |
Both Flickr Feeds and B2B LE Video Player offer paid plans only. Flickr Feeds starts at free; B2B LE Video Player starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Flickr Feeds fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; B2B LE Video Player is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. B2B LE Video Player has more onboarding documentation maturity (3 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Flickr Feeds typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). B2B LE Video Player aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Flickr Feeds and B2B LE Video Player both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flickr Feeds" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.