Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Flexible barcode and QR solutions for any business process in Salesforce. Common use cases: Inventory, Attendance, Field Service, Fulfillment, and others. Excellent implementation assistance and support.
| Gimbal Barcode | TeamUp | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Gimbal Barcode | TeamUp: Fan Engagement |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 91 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 6 | 2 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 3 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2014 | Oct 2022 |
TeamUp: Fan Engagement edges out Gimbal Barcode on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Gimbal Barcode at paid, TeamUp: Fan Engagement at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to TeamUp: Fan Engagement; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gimbal Barcode's 91-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TeamUp: Fan Engagement's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gimbal Barcode audit • TeamUp: Fan Engagement audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Gimbal Barcode | TeamUp |
|---|---|---|
| barcode | #5 | Not ranked |
| social media management | Not ranked | #7 |
| social media | Not ranked | #8 |
| mobile | #10 | Not ranked |
| barcode labels | #11 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both Gimbal Barcode and TeamUp: Fan Engagement offer paid plans only. Gimbal Barcode starts at paid; TeamUp: Fan Engagement starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
TeamUp: Fan Engagement has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Gimbal Barcode (4.9★ from 91 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
TeamUp: Fan Engagement holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Gimbal Barcode has the deeper published review base (91 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gimbal Barcode typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (91 reviews). TeamUp: Fan Engagement typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gimbal Barcode and TeamUp: Fan Engagement both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from TeamUp: Fan Engagement" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
