Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| TaroWorks | Authvia | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| TaroWorks | Authvia | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management | Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 10 | 9 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 3 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2014 | Sep 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management at paid, Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management audit • Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | TaroWorks | Authvia |
|---|---|---|
| even offline | #1 | Not ranked |
| even | #4 | Not ranked |
| payment | Not ranked | #4 |
| offline | #5 | Not ranked |
| vendor payments | Not ranked | #8 |
Both TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management and Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution offer paid plans only. TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management starts at paid; Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 9 reviews) compared to TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management (4.6★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management has the deeper published review base (10 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TaroWorks: Use Salesforce Offline for Mobile Field Service Management and Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Authvia: Payment Enablement Solution" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.