Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Sync your Epicor data—accounts, products, orders, and invoices, and more—into Salesforce with the power of AI. Stay up-to-date with no extra effort.
| Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC | Chargent Payment Processing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
- Accept credit card, ACH & subscription payments in Salesforce - Enable self-service payments in Experience Cloud - Automate recurring billing & collections - Gain real-time cash flow visibility 👉 Click ‘Try it Free’ to start your Trialforce demo
| Metric | Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC | Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 10 | ★ 528 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 4 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2014 | Mar 2009 |
Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC at paid, Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the larger user base (528 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC 's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC audit • Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC | Chargent Payment Processing |
|---|---|---|
| freeform | Not ranked | #5 |
| jotform | Not ranked | #6 |
| poll | Not ranked | #11 |
Both Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments offer paid plans only. Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC starts at paid; Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC (4.9★, 10 reviews) and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments (4.9★, 528 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (528 reviews vs 10), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (10 reviews). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (528 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Epicor (v9, 10, P21, & Kinetic) SYNC " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.