Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Linear’s Salesforce integration connects customer feedback directly to product development. Capture and track requests, sync customer context, and stay updated on development progress — all from Salesforce.
| Linear for Salesforce | Geopointe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | Linear for Salesforce | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 931 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free_to_install | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 6 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2025 | May 2010 |
Based on the data on this page, Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Linear for Salesforce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Linear for Salesforce offers a free tier (free_to_install) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Linear for Salesforce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Linear for Salesforce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Linear for Salesforce audit • Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Linear for Salesforce | Geopointe |
|---|---|---|
| plan | Not ranked | #1 |
| data from | Not ranked | #1 |
| insights and | Not ranked | #1 |
| issues | #6 | Not ranked |
| product development | #6 | Not ranked |
Linear for Salesforce is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free_to_install). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation does carry the larger published review base (931 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Linear for Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Linear for Salesforce and Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Linear for Salesforce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
