Loading content…
Geopointe vs Fuel Gas Eater
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Fuel Gas Eater | Geopointe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Fuel Gas Eater | Geopointe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Based on Net Zero Cloud, we track and aggregate the amount of CO2 generated by employees' commuting and visiting, as well as the amount of CO2 that can be reduced through work style choices (in-office or remote) and transportation options.
| Metric | Fuel Gas Eater | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 931 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2023 | May 2010 |
Based on the data on this page, Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Fuel Gas Eater's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Fuel Gas Eater offers a free tier (free) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Fuel Gas Eater's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fuel Gas Eater's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fuel Gas Eater audit • Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Fuel Gas Eater | Geopointe |
|---|---|---|
| plan | Not ranked | #1 |
| data from | Not ranked | #1 |
| insights and | Not ranked | #1 |
| employees | #10 | Not ranked |
Fuel Gas Eater is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation does carry the larger published review base (931 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fuel Gas Eater typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fuel Gas Eater and Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Fuel Gas Eater" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.