Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
SQL-Sales is an easy to use connector used within SQL Server to support retrieving data from Salesforce or loading data to Salesforce. The only knowledge you need is basic SQL and access to a SQL
| Salesforce in SQL Server | Geopointe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | Salesforce in SQL Server | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 931 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 1 | ★ 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2024 | May 2010 |
Salesforce in SQL Server edges out Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Salesforce in SQL Server at paid, Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Salesforce in SQL Server's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Salesforce in SQL Server; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's 931-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Salesforce in SQL Server's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Salesforce in SQL Server audit • Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Salesforce in SQL Server | Geopointe |
|---|---|---|
| sql server | #1 | Not ranked |
| plan | Not ranked | #1 |
| data from | Not ranked | #1 |
| insights and | Not ranked | #1 |
| server | #3 | Not ranked |
Both Salesforce in SQL Server and Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation offer paid plans only. Salesforce in SQL Server starts at paid; Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Salesforce in SQL Server has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation (4.9★ from 931 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Salesforce in SQL Server holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Salesforce in SQL Server typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Salesforce in SQL Server and Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Salesforce in SQL Server" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
