TargetRecruit vs Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs

Based on the data on this page, Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs at paid, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (198 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 198-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs or TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution cheaper?

Both Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs and TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution offer paid plans only. Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs starts at paid; TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs or TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution?

Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution (4.6★ from 198 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs or TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution?

Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Era - Optimize Licenses, Lower Costs or TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the deeper published review base (198 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.