Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker | Cloudingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
Provides an ability to track history for any fields on any object! Most standard objects and all custom objects are supported.
| Metric | Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 559 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2024 | Oct 2012 |
Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker edges out Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker at paid, Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's 559-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker audit • Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker | Cloudingo |
|---|---|---|
| system | Not ranked | #1 |
| creating | Not ranked | #1 |
| salesforce security | Not ranked | #1 |
| standard custom objects | #2 | Not ranked |
| provides unlimited field | #2 | Not ranked |
Both Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker and Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality offer paid plans only. Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker starts at paid; Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality (4.8★ from 559 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker and Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
