Loading content…
Cloudingo vs True Field History
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| True Field History | Cloudingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| True Field History | Cloudingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
True Field History is an unlimited, real-time tracking tool for Salesforce fields and objects, ensuring complete visibility and control over your data. It captures every change without limits, provides advanced rollback functionality, includes filters.
| Metric | True Field History | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 10 | ★ 559 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 7 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2025 | Oct 2012 |
Based on the data on this page, Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs True Field History's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, True Field History offers a free tier (free) while Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. True Field History's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — True Field History's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: True Field History audit • Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | True Field History | Cloudingo |
|---|---|---|
| storage costs | #1 | Not ranked |
| system | Not ranked | #1 |
| creating | Not ranked | #1 |
| salesforce security | Not ranked | #1 |
| changes over time | #4 | Not ranked |
True Field History is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 559 reviews) compared to True Field History (4.4★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
True Field History typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. True Field History and Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from True Field History" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.