Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Portwood | Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Run dispatch, tracking, load boards, and invoicing from one screen — natively inside Salesforce. Built for carriers, brokers, and shippers. No contract. Live in 14 days.
| Metric | Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native | Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 110 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 8 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2026 | Apr 2017 |
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native and Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native offers a free tier (free) while Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers has the larger user base (110 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native audit • Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Portwood | Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers |
|---|---|---|
| generation | #8 | #11 |
| generation in | #11 | #12 |
| document | #45 | #92 |
| sign document | #32 | #107 |
| document sign | #32 | #110 |
No tracked changes.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native (5.0★, 25 reviews) and Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers (5.0★, 110 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers has the deeper published review base (110 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (110 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native and Freight Transportation Manager, TMS for Carriers, Brokers, Shippers, Dispatchers both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
