Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Portwood | FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Provides hierarchical unlimited folders of unlimited depth, for Sales, Service, Community Clouds. Files stored in Salesforce; no external resource needed. Set permissions on folders. Use on object records. Import from server, pc, SharePoint.
| Metric | Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native | FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 32 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2026 | May 2014 |
Based on the data on this page, Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native at free, FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App at freemium. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App's 32-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native audit • FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Portwood | FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App |
|---|---|---|
| document | #45 | #70 |
| document scanner | #63 | #118 |
| document scan | #88 | #118 |
No tracked changes.
Both Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native and FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App offer paid plans only. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native starts at free; FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App starts at freemium. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App (4.5★ from 32 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App has the deeper published review base (32 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native and FOLDERIZE™ - Folder Structure for Salesforce Files and Attachments – Native App both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
