Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Portwood | Native Document Generation & E-Signature | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Automate document generation & e-Signature capture with a fully native app for fast, secure performance. See why thousands trust S-Docs, from SMB to Enterprise: Click “Try It” to start in minutes.
| Metric | Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native | Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 462 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2026 | Jun 2010 |
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native edges out Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native offers a free tier (free) while Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs has the larger user base (462 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs's 462-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native audit • Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Portwood | Native Document Generation & E-Signature |
|---|---|---|
| generation and esignature | #7 | #1 |
| generation | #8 | #4 |
| document generation platform | #9 | #5 |
| pdf word | #6 | #10 |
| word excel powerpoint | #12 | #6 |
No tracked changes.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs (4.8★ from 462 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs has the deeper published review base (462 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (462 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native and Native Document Generation & E-Signature: PDF, Word, XLS, Email, Reports: S-Docs both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
