Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| MedNinja | Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
| Metric | MedNinja | Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 529 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2026 | Mar 2009 |
Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs MedNinja's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: MedNinja at paid, Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MedNinja's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MedNinja's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MedNinja audit • Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | MedNinja | Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing |
|---|---|---|
| appointment | #3556 | #82 |
Both MedNinja and Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing offer paid plans only. MedNinja starts at paid; Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing does carry the larger published review base (529 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the deeper published review base (529 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
MedNinja typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (529 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. MedNinja and Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MedNinja" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
