Loading content…
Geopointe vs Multiple Opportunity Transfer
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Multiple Opportunity Transfer | Geopointe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Multiple Opportunity Transfer | Geopointe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Goal of the accelerator is to transfer bulk records of any object in SF from one user to another user within the organization based on their profile and permission sets, allowing admin/user to transfer the records based on their requirement.
| Metric | Multiple Opportunity Transfer | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 931 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 1 | ★ 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2023 | May 2010 |
Multiple Opportunity Transfer edges out Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Multiple Opportunity Transfer offers a free tier (free) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Multiple Opportunity Transfer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Multiple Opportunity Transfer; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's 931-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Multiple Opportunity Transfer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Multiple Opportunity Transfer audit • Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Multiple Opportunity Transfer | Geopointe |
|---|---|---|
| plan | Not ranked | #1 |
| data from | Not ranked | #1 |
| insights and | Not ranked | #1 |
| the records | #12 | Not ranked |
| on records | #12 | Not ranked |
Multiple Opportunity Transfer is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Multiple Opportunity Transfer has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation (4.9★ from 931 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Multiple Opportunity Transfer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Multiple Opportunity Transfer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Multiple Opportunity Transfer and Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Multiple Opportunity Transfer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.