Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Run forms, portals, eSign, docs, and surveys directly on Salesforce. From $150 per org. No per-seat pricing. Nonprofit discounts available.
| Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce | Salesforce First Web Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Contentful helps companies unlock the power of digital content so they can build faster and deliver at scale, making their content a strategic business asset. 30% of the Fortune 500 and thousands of companies rely on us to bring their ideas to life.
| Metric | Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce | Salesforce First Web Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 317 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | freemium | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 6 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 17 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2023 | Aug 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, Salesforce First Web Studio is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 5.0★ vs Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce offers a free tier (freemium) while Salesforce First Web Studio starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Salesforce First Web Studio has the larger user base (317 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Salesforce First Web Studio; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Salesforce First Web Studio's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce audit • Salesforce First Web Studio audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce | Salesforce First Web Studio |
|---|---|---|
| esign | Not ranked | #8 |
| e-sign | Not ranked | #9 |
| doc | Not ranked | #12 |
Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Salesforce First Web Studio starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Salesforce First Web Studio is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Salesforce First Web Studio has more onboarding documentation maturity (317 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Salesforce First Web Studio aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (317 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce and Salesforce First Web Studio both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Contentful Composable Storefront for B2C Commerce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
