Loading content…
Noca AI vs TargetRecruit
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Noca AI | TargetRecruit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Noca AI | TargetRecruit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| Metric | Noca AI | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 21 | ★ 198 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2025 | May 2008 |
Based on the data on this page, Noca AI is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Noca AI at paid, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (198 reviews vs 21), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Noca AI 's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Noca AI ; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 198-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Noca AI 's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Noca AI audit • TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Noca AI | TargetRecruit |
|---|---|---|
| front office | Not ranked | #1 |
| middle and back | Not ranked | #1 |
| candidate | Not ranked | #1 |
| salesforce without | #3 | Not ranked |
| ecosystem | #12 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both Noca AI and TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution offer paid plans only. Noca AI starts at paid; TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Noca AI has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 21 reviews) compared to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution (4.6★ from 198 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Noca AI holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the deeper published review base (198 vs 21), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Noca AI typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (21 reviews). TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (198 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Noca AI and TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Noca AI " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.