CloudFiles Generate & Automate vs D&B Hoovers

Based on the data on this page, CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs D&B Hoovers's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: D&B Hoovers at paid, CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — D&B Hoovers's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is D&B Hoovers or CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature cheaper?

Both D&B Hoovers and CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature offer paid plans only. D&B Hoovers starts at paid; CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose D&B Hoovers or CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature does carry the larger published review base (79 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, D&B Hoovers or CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature has the deeper published review base (79 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

D&B Hoovers typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). CloudFiles Generate & Automate: Document Generation, Automation + E-signature typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (79 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.