D&B Hoovers vs Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar-

Based on the data on this page, Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs D&B Hoovers's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: D&B Hoovers at paid, Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling has the larger user base (443 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. D&B Hoovers's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — D&B Hoovers's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is D&B Hoovers or Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling cheaper?

Both D&B Hoovers and Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling offer paid plans only. D&B Hoovers starts at paid; Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose D&B Hoovers or Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling does carry the larger published review base (443 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, D&B Hoovers or Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling has the deeper published review base (443 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

D&B Hoovers typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (443 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.