Loading content…
GatorPAS vs TargetRecruit
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| GatorPAS | TargetRecruit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| GatorPAS | TargetRecruit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| Metric | GatorPAS | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 198 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2025 | May 2008 |
Based on the data on this page, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.6★ vs GatorPAS's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: GatorPAS at paid, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (198 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GatorPAS's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GatorPAS's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GatorPAS audit • TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | GatorPAS | TargetRecruit |
|---|---|---|
| front office | Not ranked | #1 |
| middle and back | Not ranked | #1 |
| candidate | Not ranked | #1 |
| manufacturing | #7 | Not ranked |
| production | #11 | Not ranked |
Both GatorPAS and TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution offer paid plans only. GatorPAS starts at paid; TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution does carry the larger published review base (198 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the deeper published review base (198 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GatorPAS typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (198 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GatorPAS and TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GatorPAS" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.