Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Lightning Pages & Experience Sites | Skuid | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Stop waiting on developers. Build production-ready Lightning components for App Pages, Record Pages, and Experience Sites with clicks. Use 40+ ready-made components or create custom ones, drag-and-drop builder, 70+ building blocks, AgentForce-ready.
| Metric | Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni | Skuid |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 119 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | freemium | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 0 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2025 | Mar 2013 |
Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni edges out Skuid on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni offers a free tier (freemium) while Skuid starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Skuid has the larger user base (119 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Skuid's 119-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni audit • Skuid audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Lightning Pages & Experience Sites | Skuid |
|---|---|---|
| pages and experience | #3 | #4 |
| pages | #6 | #2 |
| site | #10 | #1 |
| components | #9 | #3 |
| builder | #12 | #1 |
| Signal | Lightning Pages & Experience Sites | Skuid |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 5.0 ★ (4) | 4.9 ★ (119) |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +0 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +0 |
Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Skuid starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Skuid (4.9★ from 119 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Skuid has the deeper published review base (119 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Skuid typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (119 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni and Skuid both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
