Cirrus Insight for Gmail vs Lightning Pages & Experience Sites

Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni edges out Cirrus Insight for Gmail on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

On pricing, Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni offers a free tier (freemium) while Cirrus Insight for Gmail starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

Cirrus Insight for Gmail has the larger user base (2,094 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cirrus Insight for Gmail's 2,094-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni or Cirrus Insight for Gmail cheaper?

Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Cirrus Insight for Gmail starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni or Cirrus Insight for Gmail?

Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Cirrus Insight for Gmail (4.7★ from 2,094 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni or Cirrus Insight for Gmail?

Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Lightning Pages & Experience Sites: No-Code Component Builder by Avonni or Cirrus Insight for Gmail?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cirrus Insight for Gmail has the deeper published review base (2,094 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.