Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Provides administrator with a simple user interface where he can select records for processing using an SOQL-condition and run a mass update/delete/restore job in a few clicks.
| Mass Data Manager | Outlook Integration for | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Capture Activities directly to Salesforce without compromises with the most robust integration. ✅ Sync Emails, Calendars, Leads on your own terms. ✅ 100% customizable ✅ Custom object supported ✅ Flexible deployment options ✅ 14 day Free trial
| Metric | Mass Data Manager | Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 512 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2025 | Sep 2015 |
Mass Data Manager edges out Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Mass Data Manager at free, Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid at freemium. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the larger user base (512 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mass Data Manager's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Mass Data Manager; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid's 512-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mass Data Manager's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mass Data Manager audit • Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Mass Data Manager | Outlook Integration for |
|---|---|---|
| try it | #1 | Not ranked |
| calendar sync | Not ranked | #1 |
| email tracking | Not ranked | #1 |
| calendar | Not ranked | #1 |
| production trial try | #3 | Not ranked |
Both Mass Data Manager and Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid offer paid plans only. Mass Data Manager starts at free; Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid starts at freemium. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Mass Data Manager has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid (4.8★ from 512 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mass Data Manager holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the deeper published review base (512 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Mass Data Manager typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (512 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mass Data Manager and Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mass Data Manager" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
