Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Add-On | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
Work with Salesforce data directly in Excel. Import, export, bulk update records, run SOQL queries, and streamline repeatable data tasks.
| Metric | Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 228 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | freemium |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 6 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2024 | Nov 2013 |
Based on the data on this page, XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) offers a free tier (freemium) while Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the larger user base (228 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel); mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports audit • XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) audit
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | Add-On | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) |
|---|---|---|
| data management | Not ranked | #2 |
| metadata management | Not ranked | #6 |
| data and metadata | Not ranked | #7 |
| decision-making compliance reporting | #9 | Not ranked |
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) does carry the larger published review base (228 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the deeper published review base (228 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (228 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports and XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
