Loading content…
Add-On vs Apsona for Salesforce
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Add-On | Apsona for Salesforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Add-On | Apsona for Salesforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Save a quarter of your Salesforce day, guaranteed. Apsona empowers Admins and teams to simplify workflows with cross-object reporting, doc & email merge, deduplication, and inline editing. All native to Salesforce. Just clicks, no code.
| Metric | Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports | Apsona for Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 299 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2024 | Mar 2011 |
Based on the data on this page, Apsona for Salesforce is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports at paid, Apsona for Salesforce at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Apsona for Salesforce has the larger user base (299 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Apsona for Salesforce; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Apsona for Salesforce's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports audit • Apsona for Salesforce audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Add-On | Apsona for Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| keeping teams | Not ranked | #2 |
| quickly | Not ranked | #2 |
| reporting and grant-making | Not ranked | #5 |
| decision-making compliance reporting | #9 | Not ranked |
Both Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports and Apsona for Salesforce offer paid plans only. Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports starts at paid; Apsona for Salesforce starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Apsona for Salesforce does carry the larger published review base (299 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Apsona for Salesforce has the deeper published review base (299 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Apsona for Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (299 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports and Apsona for Salesforce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.