Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Single and bulk Textlocal SMS from Pipedrive CRM with message history for each contact
| Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive | WABA Integration by Ulgebra | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Send and Receive WhatsApp messages with WhatsApp Business API integration
| Metric | Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive | WABA Integration by Ulgebra |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WABA Integration by Ulgebra is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 5.0★ vs Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive's 2.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to WABA Integration by Ulgebra; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WABA Integration by Ulgebra's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive audit • WABA Integration by Ulgebra audit
WABA Integration by Ulgebra has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive (2.0★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WABA Integration by Ulgebra holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly, and the Pipedrive Marketplace publishes no review base that would let us infer it for these two — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). WABA Integration by Ulgebra typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Textlocal SMS for Pipedrive and WABA Integration by Ulgebra both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WABA Integration by Ulgebra" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.