Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Send and Receive WhatsApp messages with WhatsApp Business API integration
| Re | WABA Integration by Ulgebra | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Re:amaze | WABA Integration by Ulgebra |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 7 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WABA Integration by Ulgebra is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 5.0★ vs Re:amaze's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to WABA Integration by Ulgebra; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Re:amaze's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WABA Integration by Ulgebra's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Re:amaze audit • WABA Integration by Ulgebra audit
WABA Integration by Ulgebra has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Re:amaze (4.5★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WABA Integration by Ulgebra holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. Re:amaze has the deeper published review base (7 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Re:amaze typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). WABA Integration by Ulgebra typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Re:amaze and WABA Integration by Ulgebra both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WABA Integration by Ulgebra" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
