Side-by-side comparison
Add Pipedrive to your Outlook desktop or web client to access Pipedrive data without leaving Outlook
| Metric | Pipechat | Pipedrive for Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.2k | 268 |
| Free plan | — | — |
On the measured data here, Pipechat leads on more dimensions (2 vs 0). Pick Pipedrive for Outlook if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Built only from the Pipedrive Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Pipechat audit • Pipedrive for Outlook audit
| Field | Pipechat | Pipedrive for Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Pipechat has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 1,223 reviews) compared to Pipedrive for Outlook (4.0★ from 268 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Pipechat holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Pipechat has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (1,223 vs 268).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Pipedrive Marketplace data. What it can show: Pipechat has 1,223 published reviews; Pipedrive for Outlook has 268 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Pipechat and Pipedrive for Outlook both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pipedrive for Outlook" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.