Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Add Pipedrive to your Outlook desktop or web client to access Pipedrive data without leaving Outlook
| Leadfeeder | Pipedrive for Outlook | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Leadfeeder | Pipedrive for Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 242 | ★ 258 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Leadfeeder is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 4.5★ vs Pipedrive for Outlook's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Leadfeeder; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pipedrive for Outlook's 258-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Leadfeeder's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Leadfeeder audit • Pipedrive for Outlook audit
Leadfeeder has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 242 reviews) compared to Pipedrive for Outlook (4.0★ from 258 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Leadfeeder holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. Pipedrive for Outlook has the deeper published review base (258 vs 242), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Leadfeeder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (242 reviews). Pipedrive for Outlook typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (258 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Leadfeeder and Pipedrive for Outlook both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Leadfeeder" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
