| LeadBoxer | Microsoft Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Get Pipedrive updates in Teams, and schedule and join video meetings from Pipedrive. Keep your team ready to close that next big deal.
| Metric | LeadBoxer | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 3.7k |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | — | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, LeadBoxer is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace merchants — 4.5★ vs Microsoft Teams's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Microsoft Teams has the larger user base (3,700 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. LeadBoxer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LeadBoxer; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Microsoft Teams's 3,700-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LeadBoxer's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LeadBoxer audit • Microsoft Teams audit
Not featured in any section recently.
LeadBoxer has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 6 reviews) compared to Microsoft Teams (4.0★ from 3,700 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LeadBoxer fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Microsoft Teams is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace marketplace. Microsoft Teams has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,700 reviews vs 6), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LeadBoxer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (6 reviews). Microsoft Teams aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3,700 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LeadBoxer and Microsoft Teams both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LeadBoxer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
