Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Grow your business by delivering better messages. Reach out and follow up with an intuitive cold email tool.
| Jotform | Woodpecker.co | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Jotform | Woodpecker.co |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 194 | 67 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 0 new | — |
Based on the data on this page, Jotform is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 4.5★ vs Woodpecker.co's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Jotform has the larger user base (194 reviews vs 67), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Woodpecker.co's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Jotform; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Woodpecker.co's 67-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jotform's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Jotform audit • Woodpecker.co audit
| Signal | Jotform | Woodpecker.co |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.5 ★ (194) | 4.0 ★ (67) |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +0 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +0 | — |
Jotform has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 194 reviews) compared to Woodpecker.co (4.0★ from 67 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Jotform holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. Jotform has the deeper published review base (194 vs 67), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Jotform typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (194 reviews). Woodpecker.co typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (67 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Jotform and Woodpecker.co both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Woodpecker.co" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
