Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Send your contacts email CX surveys via Retently and export survey answers to Pipedrive people and organizations.
| G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive | Retently CX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
The G2 app for Pipedrive syncs high-intent accounts from G2 Buyer Intent data into Pipedrive organizations and people objects.
| Metric | G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive | Retently CX |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 4 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Retently CX is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 5.0★ vs G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive at Free, Retently CX at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Retently CX; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Retently CX's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive audit • Retently CX audit
Both G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive and Retently CX offer paid plans only. G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive starts at Free; Retently CX starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Retently CX holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. Retently CX has the deeper published review base (4 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Retently CX typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive and Retently CX both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from G2 Buyer Intent + Pipedrive" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
