Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
AI Powered communication platform that connects, converts and retain customers.
| ControlHippo AI Chat Agents | Text Request | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Text contacts directly from Pipedrive with the Text Request integration and sync message history.
| Metric | ControlHippo AI Chat Agents | Text Request |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 2.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 319 | 4 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | — |
Based on the data on this page, ControlHippo AI Chat Agents is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 4.5★ vs Text Request's 2.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
ControlHippo AI Chat Agents has the larger user base (319 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Text Request's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to ControlHippo AI Chat Agents; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Text Request's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ControlHippo AI Chat Agents's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ControlHippo AI Chat Agents audit • Text Request audit
ControlHippo AI Chat Agents has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 319 reviews) compared to Text Request (2.5★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ControlHippo AI Chat Agents holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 2.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. ControlHippo AI Chat Agents has the deeper published review base (319 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ControlHippo AI Chat Agents typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (319 reviews). Text Request typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ControlHippo AI Chat Agents and Text Request both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Text Request" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
