Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cliently | Microsoft Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Cliently | Microsoft Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Get Pipedrive updates in Teams, and schedule and join video meetings from Pipedrive. Keep your team ready to close that next big deal.
| Metric | Cliently | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 3.8k |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Cliently is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 4.5★ vs Microsoft Teams's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Microsoft Teams has the larger user base (3,808 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Cliently's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Cliently; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Microsoft Teams's 3,808-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cliently's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cliently audit • Microsoft Teams audit
Cliently has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 8 reviews) compared to Microsoft Teams (4.0★ from 3,808 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Cliently holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. Microsoft Teams has the deeper published review base (3,808 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cliently typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Microsoft Teams typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,808 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cliently and Microsoft Teams both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Cliently" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.