Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Perfect LinkedIn integration for Pipedrive. Import LinkedIn profiles into Pipedrive, automatically create leads, Deals and Activities.
| Callingly | LinkMatch for Pipedrive | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Callingly | LinkMatch for Pipedrive |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 235 |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Callingly is the stronger choice for most Pipedrive Marketplace sales teams — 5.0★ vs LinkMatch for Pipedrive's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
LinkMatch for Pipedrive has the larger user base (235 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Callingly's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage sales teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Callingly; mid-market and enterprise sales teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LinkMatch for Pipedrive's 235-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Callingly's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Callingly audit • LinkMatch for Pipedrive audit
Callingly has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to LinkMatch for Pipedrive (4.5★ from 235 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Callingly holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. LinkMatch for Pipedrive has the deeper published review base (235 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Callingly typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). LinkMatch for Pipedrive typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (235 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Callingly and LinkMatch for Pipedrive both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Callingly" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
