Loading content…
Leadfeeder vs BuiltWith
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| BuiltWith | Leadfeeder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| BuiltWith | Leadfeeder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | BuiltWith | Leadfeeder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 15 | ★ 242 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | — |
BuiltWith and Leadfeeder are evenly matched on rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Leadfeeder has the larger user base (242 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. BuiltWith's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most sales teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BuiltWith audit • Leadfeeder audit
BuiltWith (4.5★, 15 reviews) and Leadfeeder (4.5★, 242 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.5★. Leadfeeder does carry the larger published review base (242 vs 15). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. Leadfeeder has the deeper published review base (242 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BuiltWith typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). Leadfeeder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (242 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BuiltWith and Leadfeeder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BuiltWith" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.