Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| spread.chat | SalesReach | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | spread.chat | SalesReach |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 9 | ★ 14 |
| Active installs | 113+ | 76+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $100/mo | From $150/mo |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed since | Aug 2022 | Jul 2021 |
SalesReach edges out spread.chat on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing is noticeably different: spread.chat at From $100/mo vs SalesReach at From $150/mo (~50% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage teams the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market teams should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to SalesReach; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — spread.chat's 9-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than SalesReach's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: spread.chat audit • SalesReach audit
No tracked changes.
Both spread.chat and SalesReach offer paid plans only. spread.chat starts at From $100/mo; SalesReach starts at From $150/mo. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
SalesReach has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 14 reviews) compared to spread.chat (4.8★ from 9 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
SalesReach holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. SalesReach has the deeper published review base (14 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
spread.chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). SalesReach typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (14 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. spread.chat and SalesReach both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from spread.chat" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
