Quotivity vs spread.chat

Quotivity edges out spread.chat on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Quotivity at Pro, spread.chat at From $100/mo. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Quotivity; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — spread.chat's 9-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Quotivity's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Quotivity or spread.chat cheaper?

Both Quotivity and spread.chat offer paid plans only. Quotivity starts at Pro; spread.chat starts at From $100/mo. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Quotivity or spread.chat?

Quotivity has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 20 reviews) compared to spread.chat (4.8★ from 9 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Quotivity or spread.chat?

Quotivity holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Quotivity or spread.chat?

Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Quotivity has the deeper published review base (20 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large HubSpot App Marketplace teams?

Quotivity typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (20 reviews). spread.chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Quotivity and spread.chat?

Migration support varies by app and category. Quotivity and spread.chat both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from spread.chat" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.