Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Book meetings quickly and easily with HubSpot and Outlook Calendar.
| Outlook Calendar | ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Outlook Calendar | ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 3.4 ★ | 3.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.5k | 12 |
| Active installs | 139,727+ | 2,307+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $5/mo | Consumption based pricing |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed since | Jan 2019 | Jan 2021 |
Outlook Calendar edges out ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich on rating (3.4★ vs 3.2★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Outlook Calendar at From $5/mo, ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich at Consumption based pricing. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Outlook Calendar has the larger user base (1,545 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook Calendar; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich's 12-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Outlook Calendar audit • ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich audit
No tracked changes.
Both Outlook Calendar and ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich offer paid plans only. Outlook Calendar starts at From $5/mo; ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich starts at Consumption based pricing. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Outlook Calendar has the higher average rating (3.4★ from 1,545 reviews) compared to ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich (3.2★ from 12 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Outlook Calendar holds the higher average rating (3.4★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Outlook Calendar has the deeper published review base (1,545 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Outlook Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,545 reviews). ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook Calendar and ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ZoomInfo Inbound Enrich" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.