Outlook Calendar vs Snowflake Data Share

Based on the data on this page, Snowflake Data Share is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 3.7★ vs Outlook Calendar's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Outlook Calendar at From $5/mo, Snowflake Data Share at Standard. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Outlook Calendar has the larger user base (1,545 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Snowflake Data Share's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Snowflake Data Share; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Outlook Calendar's 1,545-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Snowflake Data Share's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Outlook Calendar or Snowflake Data Share cheaper?

Both Outlook Calendar and Snowflake Data Share offer paid plans only. Outlook Calendar starts at From $5/mo; Snowflake Data Share starts at Standard. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Outlook Calendar or Snowflake Data Share?

Snowflake Data Share has the higher average rating (3.7★ from 10 reviews) compared to Outlook Calendar (3.4★ from 1,545 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Outlook Calendar or Snowflake Data Share?

Snowflake Data Share holds the higher average rating (3.7★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Outlook Calendar or Snowflake Data Share?

Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Outlook Calendar has the deeper published review base (1,545 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large HubSpot App Marketplace teams?

Outlook Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,545 reviews). Snowflake Data Share typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Outlook Calendar and Snowflake Data Share?

Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook Calendar and Snowflake Data Share both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Snowflake Data Share" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.