Outlook Calendar vs Quo

Outlook Calendar and Quo are evenly matched on rating (3.4★ vs 3.3★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing differs significantly: Outlook Calendar at From $5/mo vs Quo at From $33/mo (Quo is roughly 6.6x the entry-tier cost of Outlook Calendar). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.

Outlook Calendar has the larger user base (1,545 reviews vs 77), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Quo's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Outlook Calendar or Quo cheaper?

Both Outlook Calendar and Quo offer paid plans only. Outlook Calendar starts at From $5/mo; Quo starts at From $33/mo. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Outlook Calendar or Quo?

Outlook Calendar (3.4★, 1,545 reviews) and Quo (3.3★, 77 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Outlook Calendar or Quo?

Outlook Calendar holds the higher average rating (3.4★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Outlook Calendar or Quo?

Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Outlook Calendar has the deeper published review base (1,545 vs 77), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large HubSpot App Marketplace teams?

Outlook Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,545 reviews). Quo typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (77 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Outlook Calendar and Quo?

Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook Calendar and Quo both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Quo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.