Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Book meetings quickly and easily with HubSpot and Outlook Calendar.
| Outlook Calendar | Portal Audit System | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Outlook Calendar | Portal Audit System |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.4 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.5k | 9 |
| Active installs | 139,727+ | 306+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $5/mo | Starter |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed since | Jan 2019 | May 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Portal Audit System is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Outlook Calendar's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Outlook Calendar at From $5/mo, Portal Audit System at Starter. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Outlook Calendar has the larger user base (1,545 reviews vs 9), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Portal Audit System's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Portal Audit System; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Outlook Calendar's 1,545-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Portal Audit System's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Outlook Calendar audit • Portal Audit System audit
Both Outlook Calendar and Portal Audit System offer paid plans only. Outlook Calendar starts at From $5/mo; Portal Audit System starts at Starter. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Portal Audit System has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 9 reviews) compared to Outlook Calendar (3.4★ from 1,545 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Portal Audit System holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Outlook Calendar has the deeper published review base (1,545 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Outlook Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,545 reviews). Portal Audit System typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook Calendar and Portal Audit System both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Portal Audit System" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.