Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Use Microsoft Teams and HubSpot for meetings, conversations, and more!
| Microsoft Teams | PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Create, track, and eSign sales proposals & contracts inside HubSpot.
| Metric | Microsoft Teams | PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.2 ★ | ★ 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 251 | ★ 304 |
| Active installs | 63,664+ | 18,134+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free plan available | From $65/mo |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed since | Jul 2020 | Sep 2015 |
Based on the data on this page, PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.3★ vs Microsoft Teams's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Microsoft Teams offers a free tier (Free plan available) while PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments starts at From $65/mo. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments has the larger user base (304 reviews vs 251), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Microsoft Teams's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Microsoft Teams's 251-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Microsoft Teams audit • PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments audit
Microsoft Teams is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments starts at From $65/mo. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments has the higher average rating (4.3★ from 304 reviews) compared to Microsoft Teams (3.2★ from 251 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments holds the higher average rating (4.3★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments has the deeper published review base (304 vs 251), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Microsoft Teams typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (251 reviews). PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (304 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Microsoft Teams and PandaDoc | eSign, CPQ, Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Microsoft Teams" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
