Portal Replicator vs KrispCall

Based on the data on this page, KrispCall is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.6★ vs Portal Replicator's 2.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Portal Replicator offers a free tier (Free plan available) while KrispCall starts at From $15/mo. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

KrispCall has the larger user base (230 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Portal Replicator's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to KrispCall; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Portal Replicator's 15-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than KrispCall's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Portal Replicator or KrispCall cheaper?

Portal Replicator is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). KrispCall starts at From $15/mo. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Portal Replicator or KrispCall?

KrispCall has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 230 reviews) compared to Portal Replicator (2.9★ from 15 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Portal Replicator or KrispCall?

KrispCall holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 2.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Portal Replicator or KrispCall?

Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. KrispCall has the deeper published review base (230 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large HubSpot App Marketplace teams?

Portal Replicator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). KrispCall typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (230 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Portal Replicator and KrispCall?

Migration support varies by app and category. Portal Replicator and KrispCall both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Portal Replicator" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.