| GetAccept | Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | GetAccept | Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 36 | ★ 231 |
| Active installs | 998+ | 3,070+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $25/mo | From $25/mo |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 5 tiers |
| Listed since | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 |
Based on the data on this page, Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 4.5★ vs GetAccept's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing sits in similar territory: GetAccept at From $25/mo, Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling at From $25/mo (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding.
Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling has the larger user base (231 reviews vs 36), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GetAccept's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GetAccept's 36-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GetAccept audit • Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling audit
Both GetAccept and Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling offer paid plans only. GetAccept starts at From $25/mo; Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling starts at From $25/mo. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 231 reviews) compared to GetAccept (4.1★ from 36 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling has the deeper published review base (231 vs 36), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GetAccept typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (36 reviews). Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (231 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GetAccept and Salesmsg SMS Texting & Calling both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GetAccept" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
