Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Facebook Messenger | Sales Commission Calculation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Facebook Messenger | Sales Commission Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.3 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 121 | 13 |
| Active installs | 47,098+ | 59+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Starter |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed since | Oct 2019 | Feb 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, Sales Commission Calculation is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Facebook Messenger's 3.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Facebook Messenger offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Sales Commission Calculation starts at Starter. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Facebook Messenger has the larger user base (121 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Sales Commission Calculation's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Sales Commission Calculation; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Facebook Messenger's 121-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Sales Commission Calculation's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Facebook Messenger audit • Sales Commission Calculation audit
Facebook Messenger is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Sales Commission Calculation starts at Starter. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Sales Commission Calculation has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 13 reviews) compared to Facebook Messenger (3.3★ from 121 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Sales Commission Calculation holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Facebook Messenger has the deeper published review base (121 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Facebook Messenger typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (121 reviews). Sales Commission Calculation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Facebook Messenger and Sales Commission Calculation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sales Commission Calculation" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
