Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Facebook Messenger | Outlook Calendar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Book meetings quickly and easily with HubSpot and Outlook Calendar.
| Metric | Facebook Messenger | Outlook Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.3 ★ | ★ 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 121 | ★ 1.5k |
| Active installs | 47,098+ | 139,727+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free plan available | From $5/mo |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed since | Oct 2019 | Jan 2019 |
Outlook Calendar edges out Facebook Messenger on rating (3.4★ vs 3.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Facebook Messenger offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Outlook Calendar starts at From $5/mo. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Outlook Calendar has the larger user base (1,545 reviews vs 121), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Facebook Messenger's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook Calendar; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Facebook Messenger's 121-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Facebook Messenger audit • Outlook Calendar audit
Facebook Messenger is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Outlook Calendar starts at From $5/mo. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Outlook Calendar has the higher average rating (3.4★ from 1,545 reviews) compared to Facebook Messenger (3.3★ from 121 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Outlook Calendar holds the higher average rating (3.4★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Outlook Calendar has the deeper published review base (1,545 vs 121), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Facebook Messenger typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (121 reviews). Outlook Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,545 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Facebook Messenger and Outlook Calendar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Facebook Messenger" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.