| Encharge | Google Calendar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Book meetings quickly and easily with HubSpot and Google Calendar.
| Metric | Encharge | Google Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 2.1k |
| Active installs | 288+ | 293,768+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | From $159/mo | ★ Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 5 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed since | Nov 2019 | Jul 2016 |
Based on the data on this page, Encharge is the stronger choice for most HubSpot App Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Google Calendar's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Google Calendar offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Encharge starts at From $159/mo. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Google Calendar has the larger user base (2,074 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Encharge's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Encharge; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Calendar's 2,074-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Encharge's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Encharge audit • Google Calendar audit
Google Calendar is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Encharge starts at From $159/mo. Both publish their pricing on the HubSpot App Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Encharge has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Google Calendar (4.0★ from 2,074 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Encharge holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Google Calendar has the deeper published review base (2,074 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Encharge typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). Google Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2,074 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Encharge and Google Calendar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Encharge" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.